A Copper-Nickel-Silicon-Chromium Alloy for Mold Tooling
A review of the physical and mechanical properties of one copper alloy system will help moldmakers better understand how this alloy will perform thermally and mechanically in applications.
There are many industrial uses for high strength, high conductivity alloys. Copper, in its pure form, provides high conductivity, but has insufficient strength for many industrial applications, such as injection molding cores and cavities. Alloying copper with elements such as aluminum and tin improves the strength, but seriously deteriorates conductivity. One copper alloy system developed in the 20th century that provides good strength and conductivity is the copper nickel silicon system.
In 1928, this copper metal-silicide alloy system was patented by Michael Corson.1 It was subsequently known as Corson bronze. In this alloy, the silicide could be nickel-, chromium- or cobalt-based. In copper, a small addition of silicon and nickel or cobalt in a stoichiometric ratio of 1:2 results in the formation of an X2Si silicide that has a significant strengthening effect on the copper—while keeping thermal and electrical conductivity nearer that of pure copper. Likewise, chromium will form a Cr2Si3 silicide. However, with a Brinell hardness of only 135 (75 HRB), the simple silicide system found limited use.
|Figure 1: Thermograph of polycarbonate lens cooled in 15 Btu steel mold and 60 Btu copper mold. Figures courtesy of Brush Wellman.|
The alloy system found widespread application in the plastic mold industry with the introduction of a copper alloy2 that contained both nickel and chromium silicides. With a two-stage aging process, this alloy provided hardness in excess of 92 HRB and conductivity in excess of 200 W/m/K. This alloy was given UNS designation C18000, with an approximate composition by weight of 2.5 percent nickel, 0.75 percent silicon, 0.4 percent chromium and the balance copper.
Modifying C18000 by increasing the nickel concentration to about 7 percent and silicon to about 2 percent by weight resulted in a higher strength Corson bronze (denoted in this paper as CNS-V for copper nickel silicide, version 5).3 With a hardness of 29 HRC and a thermal conductivity of about 140 W/m/K in wrought sections larger than 25mm, the alloy found application as a replacement for mold alloys such as P-20 tool steel and C17200 copper beryllium. As this alloy system is fairly young, a review of its physical and mechanical properties will help moldmakers better understand its applications, benefits and limitations. These are compared with that of other common mold materials to aid the designer in using this alloy in mold tooling.
|Electrical conductivity||ASTM E 1004|
|Thermal diffusivity||ASTM E 1461|
|Heat capacity||ASTM E 1269|
|Hardness||ASTM E 10, E 18, E 384|
|Tensile properties||ASTM E 8, E 111|
|Compression strength||ASTM E 9|
|Impact strength||ASTM E 23|
|Fatigue strength||rotary fatigue*|
|Measured physical properties and the ASTM test method employed. *No ASTM test method published. Tables courtesy of Brush Wellman.|
Thermal Conductivity Background
The primary attribute of CNS-V that makes it attractive to the mold industry is its high thermal conductivity (high strength is easily provided by tool steels). With conductivity in excess of five times that of common tool steels, the alloy can be used in injection mold core and cavity applications to remove hot spots, reduce warpage and reduce cycle time.4,5 The overall effect is better productivity.
Figure 2: A schematic of an RR Moore type rotary fatigue test.
To demonstrate the cooling efficiency of high conductivity mold materials, a case study was conducted in which polycarbonate ophthalmic lenses were molded in 24 W/m/K (14 Btu/hr/ft/°F) 420 stainless steel inserts and also in 130 W/m/K (75 Btu/hr/ft/°F) C17200 copper alloy inserts. The polycarbonate lenses were 2 mm thick and formed from an ophthalmic grade polycarbonate injected at 310°C. Cooling water was circulated at 55°C. Thermographic images of the lenses ejected from the mold are shown in Figure 1. The images show that even with a cooling cycle 60 percent shorter (10 vs. 25 seconds), the high conductivity mold provided more cooling than the stainless steel mold.
Test Procedures for Evaluating Mold Alloys
The properties measured on one or more samples of CNS-V and their respective ASTM test methods are given in Table 1. Only the rotary fatigue testing lacks a recognized test procedure. This testing is performed by rotating a rod with a reduced mid-section while applying a fixed moment on the axis (see Figure 2). This results in a fully reversed load (R= -1) on the center of the test rod. This testing is known as RR Moore testing after the manufacturer of this type of apparatus.
|Tensile Yield Strength||MPa||790||770||720||895|
|Ultimate Tensile Stength||MPa||880||960||770||1020|
|Elongation||% in 3D||7||15||6||20|
|107 Fatigue Strength||MPa||275||345||250||—|
|Charpy Energy||J||< 7||8-20||19||30|
|Thermal Conductivity 100° C||W/m/K||160||155||67||29|
|Electrical Conductivity 20° C||MS/m||18-20||16-20||8.0||—|
|Density 20° C||kg/m3||8690||8320||8940||7800|
|Useful properties of several mold alloys.|
Link to this article：A Copper-Nickel-Silicon-Chromium Alloy for Mold Tooling
Reprint Statement: If there are no special instructions, all articles on this site are original. Please indicate the source for reprinting:Mold Wiki，Thanks